Board/Partners Login:

Platform for Progress Gubernatorial Campaign Pledges



Jon Corzine (D)

In order to balance the budget, some people say the state should hold the line on spending even if programs are reduced. Others say to balance the budget the state should raise taxes if necessary and continue to support state programs. Which position comes closest to your view?

We need to change the way we look at these issues. In March, I outlined a comprehensive fiscal and economic development plan to replace the failed tax, borrow, and spend framework of the past with a new paradigm of invest, grow, and prosper. Details are available on my website

If I am elected Governor, I will make economic development a top priority so we can grow New Jersey’s economy and create thousands of new jobs, which in turn will generate hundreds of millions of dollars in new revenues without new taxes. 

I also will transform how we look at government spending by instituting outcome-based budgeting, where programs are scored based on their effectiveness, and those that don’t deliver results are eliminated. 

Further, I will take aggressive action to eliminate wasteful spending and manage government more effectively, through such steps as consolidating the purchasing of prescription drugs by state agencies and maximizing use of common technology platforms

 
The first thing government should do when faced with a deficit is to look to trim expenses and identify efficiencies. Once efficiencies and savings have been found government should conduct an audit to determine if the priority programs are receiving the amount of resources needed.

Such an audit should also seek to identify programs that are not a priority or could be eliminated or if there are any duplication of services. Many times a program has served its purpose but, rarely does government eliminate the line item on the budget. Raising taxes should be a last resort for government. 

At a business, if there was not enough money in the company's checkbook to cover expenses, would employees be permitted to go to their bosses and ask for raises and to increase spending?

The answer would be "no." That is not the case with government.
In general, do you support or oppose the expansion of state-funded incentive programs to attract new businesses to New Jersey and encourage existing ones to stay and expand?

Having led one of the world’s largest financial firms, where I worked with hundreds of companies and dozens of domestic and foreign governments, I know what businesses need to grow and that government can be a catalyst for growth. 

If I am elected, I will bring that expertise to bear and will be personally and actively involved in efforts to bring businesses to New Jersey and encourage those already here to expand in New Jersey. Before deciding how to proceed with the programs currently in place, I will review each program to make sure we are getting the best results for our investment. 

I also will make sure that we bring greater coordination and strategic planning to our business expansion and retention efforts.

State incentive programs such as the Business Employment Incentive Program (BEIP) and the Business Retention & Relocation Assistance Grant (BRRAG) have not only served to attract hundreds of thousands of high paying jobs to New Jersey, the program has been copied by other states because it is so successful. 

Neighboring states and others such as North Carolina who compete directly with us for employers offer incentives we do not – a guaranteed permit procedure, a lower cost of doing business and living – so offering incentive programs serves to level the playing field.

The Platform for Progress campaign supports the examination of the expansion of state-funded incentive programs to attract new businesses to New Jersey and encourage existing ones to stay and expand.

Do you intend to increase, keep the same, or decrease the allocation in the state's budget that offsets the $2,300 application fee for New Jersey teachers who want to become certified to the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards?

I strongly support professional development of teachers and other educational support professionals. New Jersey has a lot of great teachers and we need more. 

If elected, I plan to work with teachers to conduct outreach and education on the need for professional development, including increasing the number of national certified teachers. 

I also plan to provide a $5,000 loan forgiveness program for high need sectors, including math and science teachers.

For a number of years, research indicates that the quality of the teacher in the classroom is key to student success, with teacher quality being up to 20 times more important than class size, curriculum, or technology. 

In the last year, a significant number of studies have shown that students who have teachers certified to the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards make significant learning gains, often outpacing students with non-Board certified teachers by as many as two months per year. 

In urban areas, National Board Certified Teachers can increase student learning by up to 3.5 months a year. New Jersey has one of the highest achievement gaps in the nation, with our low income and minority students significantly under-performing their suburban white peers. National Board Certification for New Jersey teachers is one way to help close the gap.
Some states have mandated a college preparatory curriculum in language arts, mathematics, and science as the "default," or minimum, high school curriculum. New Jersey is not one of these states. Would you support or oppose legislation that defines such a default high school curriculum for New Jersey?

I plan on releasing a comprehensive education plan in September that will ensure that all students are challenged and are given the skills and knowledge needed to get ahead in college and their careers. 

We need to ensure that our elementary, middle and high school curriculum is aligned with the skills and knowledge that will make our students successful in college, in jobs and in life.

Widely-referenced longitudinal research indicates that the most critical indicator for life success, whether a student goes to college or directly to the workplace, is the level of rigor of their high school course sequence. 

Students who complete rigorous courses, especially in mathematics (Algebra I, II and Geometry), acquire the critical thinking skills that both colleges and employers expect them to have. Students taking the ‘State Scholars’ demanding course sequence have a better chance at college entry and graduation, and routinely earn as much as 13% more annually in the workplace, even when college is not present. 

Yet few schools and few parents know how critical high school course sequence is, and over the last twenty years, many high schools have deliberately reduced the level of rigor of their course offerings.
Would you support or oppose an increase in state funding for schools that would allow them to initiate the national State Scholars program, which encourages high school students to take demanding course work?

I support challenging all students, including our advanced students. We must raise the bar in terms of our expectations and ensure we have the programs to achieve these goals. I also support expanding the use of AP coursework and offering new options, such as pre-engineering as an elective.

The Platform for Progress campaign supports an increase in state funding for schools that would allow them to initiate the national State Scholars program, which encourages high school students to take demanding course work.
Would you support or oppose legislation that created general permits designed to reduce review and process time for small R&D operations?

As a former businessman, I understand the need for business to have a positive regulatory climate to grow. 

I think New Jersey’s successful and growing economy combined with strong environmental laws has demonstrated that environmental protection and economic growth are not mutually exclusive goals. 

I will build upon this legacy with initiatives like investing in renewable energy that will create jobs and result in new technologies to reduce the cost of energy for all New Jersey businesses. 

As to the question of general permits, I do not have enough information to respond to the question, but I would be willing to review the details of your proposal at a later time.

Creating a stable business climate should be one of the top priorities for the next Governor. The uncertainty of the permitting process leads many businesses to forgo expansion in New Jersey for more employer-friendly areas of the country. 

The Platform for Progress campaign does not advocate diminishing the standards in place, but does believe that every business in the state should have a level of comfort when it comes to dealing with state agencies. Currently, there is a crisis of confidence by employers when dealing with government agencies.

Expedited permits will increase the chance for New Jersey to attract small R&D operations. Therefore, we support efforts that create general permits designed to reduce review and process time for small R&D operations.
Would you support or oppose a 4-cent-per-thousand-gallon water tax to be allocated towards water supply construction, infrastructure repairs, and to assist in purchasing undeveloped land in the Highlands region of the State?

I support maintaining and improving our water supply infrastructure and protecting the Highlands. I was proud to secure $110 million in federal funding for Highlands open space preservation. 

I would find other means of supporting these programs, rather than creating a water tax.

The Platform for Progress campaign opposes a 4-cent-per-thousand-gallon water tax to be allocated towards water supply construction, infrastructure repairs, and to assist in purchasing undeveloped land in the Highlands region of the State.
In general, would you support or oppose legislation that aims to consolidate some local, county, and state operations?

I believe strongly in the benefits of consolidation and will work aggressively to consolidate state government functions whenever practical. 

To bring those same benefits to the local level, I will work with county and local governments and school districts to create incentives for shared services, consolidated or regional approaches to delivering government services, and greater use of leveraged purchasing power.

New Jersey has over 1,000 taxing entities, 566 municipalities, 21 counties and over 600 boards of education. There are fire districts, sewage authorities, parking agencies – all with staff, with contracts and with infrastructure. 

New Jersey can provide the same level of services to our residents with less layers of government and the next governor should look at this consolidation as one way to lower property taxes.
Do you support or oppose legislation that would forfeit pension and retirement benefits for public officials and public employees convicted of crimes involving their office?

Those who have abused the public trust and have been convicted of a crime involving their office should forfeit their pension and retirement benefits. 

If our current laws, which allow pension boards to impose this sanction, are not adequate, I would support strengthening those laws.

Any elected official or government employee convicted of a crime that was a direct result of their position should lose their pension and retirement benefits. 

New Jersey has permitted a culture of corruption for too long. Requiring the forfeiture of a pension would pose a significant deterrent to illegal activity.
Do you support or oppose legislation that makes available funds to health care providers to help them implement quality measurements designed to reduce medical errors at all levels of the health care delivery system?

I am a strong supporter of efforts to make funds available to help health care providers implement quality measurements designed to reduce medical errors.

Medical error reduction is something that must be done in New Jersey to improve the quality of health care. An investment in health care quality improvements will lead to a reduction in unnecessary administrative costs and allow our health care system to grow and prosper. Nationally, anesthesiologists reduced medical errors themselves by implementing special medical practice standards a number of years ago. As a result, that group’s medical liability insurance premiums have not increased as dramatically as have those for physicians in other specialties and subspecialties.

The Center for Information Technology estimates that approximately 20 percent of medical tests are ordered a second time simply because previous results cannot be found. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates that the national health information network can save approximately $140 billion annually by improving care, reducing medical errors, and eliminating duplicative tests.

In my health care plan, I will require health insurance plans participating in any State-subsidized health plan to have 95 percent automation and connectivity for all HIPAA transactions by all payers and providers within three years. I will also build an Electronic Data Information (EDI) network that would handle: electronic claims submission, plan eligibility determination, payment and remittance advice, health claim status determination, and delivery of referrals and authorizations.

In 2003, it was estimated that there were approximately 1,316 to 2,930 preventable deaths due to medical errors in New Jersey. These are errors that could be significantly lowered if the health care industry implemented nationally recognized quality measures and technology upgrades.

The Platform for Progress campaign believes government should play a role in helping to provide financing for high cost technology items that could reduce medical errors and save lives. This financial assistance should go hand in hand with the adoption of national standards such as Leap Frog or other standards that serve to reduce the high rate of medical errors.

Do you support or oppose legislation mandating coverage of additional benefits such as coverage for morbid obesity, drug/alcohol rehabilitation, hair replacement, or sex change operations by health insurance providers?

We must reduce health care costs. All options need to be on the table, including whether New Jersey insurance companies should offer a "mandate-free" or "mandate-lite" insurance product. While all mandates are well-intentioned, their collective impact can price many New Jerseyans out of the health insurance market.

As we conduct this review, I believe some other benefits should be considered, such as mental health parity of which I am a co-sponsor in the U.S. Senate.

Mandates serve to drive up the cost of health insurance at a time when the costs are already out of reach for many small business owners. Currently, only 53 percent of firms with 50 or less employees offer health insurance to employees.

The Platform for Progress campaign opposes health mandates and supports incentives for insurance companies to provide coverage for a variety of infirmities.
Do you support or oppose the ability of small businesses to pool together to purchase employee health insurance packages?

I am a strong supporter of efforts to "pool" or bulk purchasing. It is an essential ingredient to leveraging the purchasing power of state and private entities. In my health care plan I outlined a proposal that would help small businesses offer affordable health care to their employees. 

My New Jersey Small Business Health Alliance plan would:

1. Create regional (North and South Jersey) "stop-loss" purchasing pools;

2. In the first year provide:
Open enrollment to firms with 25 employees; Benefits for employers who have not offered insurance in the last year; and That firms with five or less employees must have full employee participation;

3. Provide benefits for an estimated 40,678 individuals in the first year; and

4. Allow expansion in years two and three.

I am open to additional ideas that the Chamber or other businesses have about how the state can help small businesses reduce costs.
With family health insurance coverage expected to cost over $14,000 next year and with the number of uninsured in New Jersey topping 1.2 million people, the time has come for the state Legislature to act and do something. The Platform for Progress campaign supports the ability of small businesses to pool together to purchase employee health insurance packages to lower costs. 

Encouraging the use of Health Savings Accounts and increasing competition in the market place is also supported.

Lowering the cost of health insurance for the employer community should be one of the top priorities of the incoming governor.
Do you support or oppose the ability of small businesses to purchase employee health care policies providing very basic benefits?

My health care plan also contains a proposal that would improve the ability of small businesses to offer basic benefits. I will help small businesses seek regulatory relief by:

Allowing small employers to design their own plans rather than the State’s mandated "one size-fits-all" approach and reduce the number of different plans that the State mandates that businesses offer;

Requiring that insurance companies offer one plan with monthly payments that are no more than 20 percent of an average worker’s salary;

Eliminating barriers that stop small businesses from offering health care to their employees including a State requirement that 75 percent of employees are enrolled in health care plans; and

Allowing small employers to take advantage of Health Savings Accounts that are set up to pay the current and future medical expenses of people who are covered by high-deductible plans.

A bare bones insurance product would help to reduce the number of uninsured in New Jersey, which is at around 1.2 million. However, this in and of itself it is not the silver bullet solution to the health insurance crisis we face. 

New Jersey must develop a comprehensive approach to health care reform and not be afraid of eliminating current laws or regulations that do nothing to improve access or lower costs.

Do you support or oppose an increase in the gas tax dedicated to replenish the Transportation Trust Fund?

A world class transportation system is vital to New Jersey’s economic future, and we must ensure that we have adequate funding to pay for necessary repairs and upgrades.  However, given the recent spike in oil and gas prices that is squeezing family budgets, we must find other alternatives to raising the gas tax, which must be our absolute last resort. 

First, we need to reform the Transportation Trust Fund, which has been mismanaged for a decade. I will end the practice of raiding the Trust Fund to pay for operating costs. My administration will fund transportation projects based on the needs of New Jersey drivers and rail passengers, not the needs of politicians. And we need an elected state comptroller who will oversee the management of the Fund to ensure that is it no longer abused.

We must also explore new funding options such as repositioning assets, including state-owned land adjacent to train stations and major state highways, to allow us to make critical transportation investments. One thing is for sure: I will not let Washington keep $1.3 billion of our tax dollars that are supposed to fund transportation improvements because we couldn’t come up with the matching state funds.

The Platform for Progress campaign supports a variety of dedicated funding sources for the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF), including a gas tax, to pay for the transportation infrastructure needs of the state. 

We oppose the use of TTF monies for anything other than capital projects, and supports legislation that would provide proper oversight for TTF dollars.
Do you support or oppose the privatization of the NJ Turnpike as a funding source to replenish the Transportation Trust Fund?

Given our transportation funding crisis, I believe we must explore options such as repositioning assets like the Turnpike.

The goal of the Platform for Progress campaign is to advocate for a stable, long-term transportation funding program that best serves residents. We will be examining all funding options to determine which best suits the needs of New Jerseyans.
Open ended response

Corzine: 

N/A

 

Assembly Candidate Surveys